Despite owning the leading premium brand in its industry, Victoria’s Secret parent company L Brands (NYSE: LB) is having a very challenging year. Shares of the company, which also owns Bath & Body Works and the PINK apparel brand, are down a stunning 52% on the year.
Those kinds of metrics portend a rapid deterioration, but also might bring out value investors, who often look at beaten-down stocks poised for a turnaround.
At first glance, it may seem like L Brands is doing OK. Last quarter, revenue climbed 8.3%, which doesn’t exactly make the company seem like a deteriorating business. However, a closer look at its financials reveals those growth numbers aren’t nearly as beautiful as they appear.
Accounting changes mask weakness
L Brands’ fiscal 2018 revenue is benefiting from a recent accounting change having to do with the company’s private-label credit card, which it distributes through a partnership with Alliance Data Systems.
Previously, L Brands recorded the revenue it received from the Victoria’s Secret credit card as a reduction in selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) costs. Under new accounting rules, though, the company now counts card revenue in its top line. This change increases reported SG&A expenses in tandem. As you can see, last quarter’s top-line growth was overwhelmed by a rise in expenses, especially SG&A.
Q2 YoY Growth
|Costs of goods sold||11.4%|
Rising costs on both the costs of goods sold and SG&A lines led to a nasty 24.2% reduction in operating profit. Not only did SG&A expenses explode higher, but gross margin also fell, likely indicating that the company is heavily discounting to clear inventory: not good for a premium brand.
Unsurprisingly, L Brands lowered its full-year earnings per share guidance to $2.45-$2.70, down from the prior range of $2.70-$3.00. What’s even worse is that L Brands had already lowered its EPS guidance just three months ago from an initial range of $2.95-$3.25. Two successive guide-downs mean management seems to have lost its sense of demand and industry dynamics. That’s (understandably) sending investors into a panic.
And it gets worse
A company that is struggling in its core business could be in double jeopardy if its balance sheet is in question. Unfortunately, that also seems to be the case here. Despite a profit crunch and stagnating sales, L Brands’ inventory was up both year over year and quarter over quarter at the end of last quarter. That could mean L Brands has produced too much inventory, which could lead to even larger clearance sales in the future.
In addition, the company’s debt load has crept up to $5.8 billion as of May. As profit has tumbled, its interest coverage ratio — or how many times annual interest expense is covered by operating income — has dropped from over six two years ago to just under four today:
Take off down the runway
While L Brands’ 9%-plus dividend yield and low P/E ratio are tempting, I wouldn’t touch the stock right now. It has all of the elements of a value trap. Unless the business can turn around in short order, it’s quite possible the company will have to cut its dividend in the near future. That would probably be the right move, but it will likely disappoint current investors and cause another big sell-off.
While it’s possible L Brands has hit bottom, it’s very hard to tell. Retail is tricky, as it’s hard to know which products will resonate with customers and which ones will fizzle out. With a declining business and high debt load, L Brands stock has the potential to trade even lower. I’d steer clear.
10 stocks we like better than L Brands
When investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*
David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now… and L Brands wasn’t one of them! That’s right — they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.
Click here to learn about these picks!
*Stock Advisor returns as of August 6, 2018
Billy Duberstein has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. His clients may own shares of some ofthe companies mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.